Most pertinent to this site, Rita's striking assertion is that skillfully managing declining businesses is terribly important. In the frame of transient competitive advantage, a declining business isn't a failure or a tragedy; it's a fact of life, and handling decline thoughtfully - resetting expectations, reducing investment, shifting resources to new growth areas, possibly divesting - can in itself create strategic advantage, by enabling more investment and focus on vital new businesses. This is especially important because companies tend to embrace the alternative - investing more to get less, hanging onto old successes too long, isolating and protecting businesses in "strategic business unit" lockboxes.
Metaphorically, a company in the "transient competitive advantage" world is less like an edifice and more like a sports team. We expect buildings to last, unchanged, for decades. We expect sports teams to look different from year to year. A team that's successful for a long time (the New England Patriots or the San Antonio Spurs, for example) will turn over its roster regularly. It will always be looking for new players to plug in and will be wary of relying on too many players past their primes. A less successful team will hold onto its players too long, hoping the poor results from this season are not the signs of a prolonged decline but instead are an aberration.
No comments:
Post a Comment